![]() |
![]() Taran Adarsh and Komal Nahta can be rated as the best film critics in our country. They review the film in right perspective. Raja Sen, Sukanya Verma and Rajeev Masand are the worst film critics of our country. What are they thinking when they are reviewing the films? They live in their own La La land of writing reviews. They have been brought up watching Hollywood films. Do they understand emotions of Hindi films which are made for the masses? The movies and books are different. As a writer, you can be literary but not in films. The same film is watched by an IT Guy in a multiplex and an auto driver in single screens. The film has to justify in entertaining all kind of audiences in the country.
The critic's review can kill a film at the box office so critics have responsibility towards the film industry. Most of the people in the film industry do not take critics seriously and it is the fault of critics also because they have not been responsible enough. How much film critics is helping film industry earning financially more for positive reviews? 95% films gets bad or average reviews by most of the critics. I never understand the rating of 1 or 2 for a film by critics. We should have audience rating for critics. Let us take an example of 'Tubelight'. Cinematography is excellent. The background score is good. The music is above average but suits the sensibility of the film. The performances of actors are good. The art direction is good. Dialogues are above average. The film fails only at script and screenplay level. Is the rating of one fair on the movie 'Tubelight'? Is credibility of critics in our country is questionable?
Latest Features » ![]() |
Comments | Contact Us | Advertise | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy |